Supreme Court Releases Joint Statement About Liberal Extremism

Supreme Court Releases Joint Statement About Liberal Extremism

Late last week, all nine justices of the Supreme Court issued a statement opposing Senate Democrats’ efforts to impose new ethics oversight measures over the country’s highest court. This comes after the political Left attempted to stir up controversy that surround three conservative justices in the past few weeks.

The judges’ statement also contained a letter from the court’s chief justice, John Roberts, to Senate Judicial Committee Chair Richard Durbin (D-IL) stating that he will not be attending a hearing requested by Senate Democrats.

“Testimony by the Chief Justice of the United States before the Senate Judiciary Committee is extremely rare, as one would anticipate in light of the separation of powers concerns along with the importance of maintaining judicial independence,” Roberts stated.

The statement from the nine justices stated that they authored it in order “to offer further clarification to the bar as well as the public regarding the way the Justices handle certain recurring problems and also to put to rest a few common misconceptions.”


Most Popular

The letter then detailed how the judges handle a range of concerns, some of which were even raised in recent left-wing assaults on judges Roberts, Clarence Thomas, and Neil Gorsuch.

“Even though it isn’t explicitly stated, the court appears to be rejecting Democratic legislation that would have required the justices to adhere to the same ethical standards as all other federal judges,” according to the Associated Press report.

The letter also highlighted previous threats against justices, which peaked last year when a leftist allegedly tried to murder three conservative justices.

“A word on security is required. Judges at all levels experience increased threats to their personal safety,” according to the letter. “These threats are amplified in the case of Supreme Court members due to the higher profile of the issues they address. Recent events demonstrate that such threats are not just hypothetical. The Supreme Court Police, United States Marshals, state and local law enforcement, and other agencies are in charge of security. Matters discussed here, including travel, lodging, and disclosure, may at times be subject to security recommendations.”

Author: Scott Dowdy


Most Popular


Most Popular


You Might Also Like:

The GOP Is Recruiting Fetterman — And the Fact That He Didn’t Say No Tells You Everything

The GOP Is Recruiting Fetterman — And the Fact That He Didn’t Say No Tells You Everything

We’ve officially entered the timeline where Republicans are openly courting a guy who ran against Dr. Oz in…
Kill a Jewish Man at a Pro-Israel Rally, Get Less Time Than a DUI — Welcome to California Justice

Kill a Jewish Man at a Pro-Israel Rally, Get Less Time Than a DUI — Welcome to California Justice

Paul Kessler was sixty-nine years old. He showed up to a pro-Israel rally in Thousand Oaks, California, because he believed…
The Pawn Stars Guy Has Heard Every Pitch in America — He Says Trump Might Be the Greatest President Ever

The Pawn Stars Guy Has Heard Every Pitch in America — He Says Trump Might Be the Greatest President Ever

Rick Harrison has spent his entire career doing one thing better than almost anyone alive: figuring out what…
A Man Opened Fire on Secret Service Agents Near the White House. The Media Gave It a Paragraph.

A Man Opened Fire on Secret Service Agents Near the White House. The Media Gave It a Paragraph.

On Monday afternoon, a 45-year-old man from Texas named Michael Marx drew a firearm and opened fire on…