“Wine and beer were often served at Capitol Hill catered receptions,” tweeted Chad Pergram of Fox News Channel. “But now alcohol may be delivered straight to a Member’s office.”
The House Administration Committee quietly approved a rule change that made this new service possible last week. The “House Liquor Rule” amendment now allows the delivery of wine, beer, and spirits to a Member’s office only if the alcohol is for personal consumption and not for resale or giving.
In addition, the beverage must be delivered by a legal vendor who uses “sealed containers” and delivers the alcohol “directly to the Member’s office.”
It’s uncertain how many lawmakers will use this new benefit, but it’ll be well-received by those who enjoy a drink or two (or three). Can you figure out which politician will have the biggest tab?
“Bulk orders” for drinks “by the case” can be found on Sodexo’s House of Representatives site under the “Drinks on Demand” heading.
According to The Daily Wire:
“Tito’s vodka, Johnnie Walker scotch, Jack Daniels whiskey, and other spirits are all available at a range of prices from $16 to $35 per bottle.”
“For the frugal legislator, beer, which can only be bought in bulk, costs from $25 for a 24-pack of Busch to $50 for a case of Red Bear 51st State Hazy IPA.”
“When it comes to wine, though, the opportunities explode. For remote lawmakers out of touch with their beer-and-a-shot, working-class constituents, various brands in each Cabernet, Sauvignon Blanc, Malbec, Merlot, Chardonnay, Rose, Pinot Noir, Pinot Grigio, and Riesling category.”
“But to be honest, the most expensive wine on the menu is just $25 a bottle, and legislators may be satisfied with Crane Lake Pinot Grigio for around $10 a bottle.”
Who is footing the bill for all this booze?
It will, however, not be the taxpayers who foot the bill. While the members and their staff will be reimbursed for non-alcoholic beverage and food expenses incurred while participating in virtual legislative planning sessions under House rules, Americans pay for Peloton memberships for employees.
However, “members and workers may not be reimbursed for the expense of alcoholic beverages,” it adds.
Of course, many Americans would question the benefit of anything like this. Because it isn’t the greatest look.
At least we’re not the ones having to pay for it… this time.
