American Doctor Group Finds A New Form Of “Racism”

The AMA pressed for relying on “alternative measures” for diagnosing obesity in place of body mass index (BMI) classification, calling it a “racist” measurement system.

The AMA stated last week that it has decided to establish a new guideline to clarify the use of BMI as a measurement in medicine. BMI is a straightforward formula that compares a person’s height and weight to determine their total body fat.

The “problematic history” with BMI, which has been extensively employed since the early 1970s, is evaluated in the AMA Council on Public Health and Science report, which contains the new policy’s specifics, as it considers “alternatives.”

The paper also discusses the “negative impacts and advantages of using BMI,” which is described in the release as a “imperfect way for calculating body fat in various groups due to the fact it fails to allow for differences between race/ethnic groups of people, genders, males and females and age-span.”

The new policy encourages the AMA to “train physicians on the problems associated with BMI and different options for the diagnosis of obesity,” it states in regard to the findings, including that the AMA “recognizes problems concerning employing BMI as a measurement because of its long history of harm, its implications for racist exclusion, and since BMI depends primarily on information gathered from earlier generations of non-Hispanic white people in general.”

“The AMA further recognizes the fact that relative shape of the body and structure variations across race/ethnic groups of people, males, and females, genders, as well as age-span are crucial to take into account when implementing BMI as a measure of obesity and that a body mass index shouldn’t serve as a sole criterion to deny suitable insurance reimbursement,” the organization continues.

The way BMI “has traditionally been utilized to calculate body fat as well as diagnose obesity” is susceptible to a number of issues, according to AMA Immediate Previous President Jack Resneck Jr. M.D. He adds that it is “important for doctors to recognize the advantages and drawbacks of using BMI in clinical environments in order to decide on the most effective treatment for their patients.”

Members of the American Medical Association (AMA) called attention to the “racist roots” of the BMI this past month, in addition to the “flawed research, misconceptions, and stigma that individuals with obesity experience.”

A Washington Post column published in April urged parents to “cancel diet mentality” and support kids in “resisting” the pressure to fit into “anti-fat expectations.”

In a SELF magazine article published last year, it was alleged that “fatphobia” prevents obese individuals from engaging in exercise activities and that BMI has a “racist history.”

The essay asserted that popular “anti-fatness” and racial prejudice go hand in hand and that “anti-fat bias has existed as an aspect of white America for generations.”

The magazine Cosmopolitan marketed plus-size women in 2021 as being “healthy.”